Symbolism plays a big role in storytelling, often revealing more about a character’s psychology than dialogue alone.
In Netflix’s Adolescence, one such moment comes in episode 3, when psychologist Briony Ariston brings Jamie a cheese and pickle sandwich. It remains untouched for most of their conversation until Jamie eventually takes a bite. While this might seem insignificant at first, Briony’s reaction at the end of the episode — physically recoiling when she goes to clear the table — suggests that the sandwich carries a deeper meaning.
Psychologists and viewers alike have debated what the sandwich represents. Some suggest it was a subtle psychological test, gauging Jamie’s ability to assert himself. Others believe it mirrors Briony’s emotional shift as she realises the truth about Jamie. The scene raises questions about how small actions in psychological assessments can reveal hidden aspects of a person’s mind and how seemingly ordinary objects can take on powerful symbolic weight.
Just like Briony, how do psychologists use small, seemingly insignificant actions — such as eating or rejecting food — as tools for assessing personality and behaviour?
Neha Cadabam, senior psychologist and executive director at Cadabams Hospitals, tells indianexpress.com, “Psychologists often analyse micro-behaviours, such as food choices, reactions to certain tastes, or the act of offering and rejecting food, as subtle indicators of personality, emotional state, and underlying psychological dynamics. Eating habits are deeply tied to emotions, past experiences, and social conditioning.”
Sonal Khangarot, a licensed rehabilitation counsellor and psychotherapist, adds, “As a psychologist, she was likely fostering rapport and creating a safe space, which is crucial for effective therapy. Given that it was her final session, she used the time to observe Jamie’s reactions and assertiveness, which could contribute to her treatment findings.”
Cadabam notes that in Jamie’s case, rejecting the sandwich may symbolise “deeper resistance, discomfort, or even an assertion of autonomy.” His reaction could reflect an emotional boundary, an aversion formed through past experiences, or simply a desire to control his surroundings. “On the other hand, Briony’s decision to give him something she already knows he dislikes suggests an unconscious attempt to test his reaction, provoke a response, or communicate something beyond words,” she says.
Khangarot, however, asserts, “However, this moment should not be overanalyzed in isolation. The real focus remains on Briony’s psychological interviewing, emotional composure, and ability to handle breaches of personal boundaries, all of which highlight essential therapeutic skills.”
What Briony’s reaction to the sandwich tells us about her psychological state
Briony’s reaction to the sandwich after her conversation with Jamie should be viewed through the lens of her role as a trained professional rather than speculation about her psychological state, Khangarot explains. “As a therapist working with individuals accused of serious crimes, she has chosen a field that requires emotional resilience and professional detachment.”
Story continues below this ad
Cadabam, on the other hand, believes that Briony’s action suggests an internal conflict. “The act of giving Jamie a sandwich he does not like could be a passive-aggressive gesture, an unconscious attempt to distance herself, or a way of expressing frustration without direct confrontation. It might also reflect a need for control — after a conversation that left her emotionally unsettled, she reclaims agency in a subtle but pointed way.”
Alternatively, she notes that this could be an “act of deflection.” Instead of openly addressing her emotions, “she externalises them through indirect behaviour, hoping for a reaction that validates her feelings.” Sometimes, small, seemingly inconsequential actions like this are ways people express unresolved emotions when they struggle to articulate them directly.
“With the limited information available in the show, we cannot conclusively label this as countertransference (when a therapist unconsciously projects their own emotions onto a client). Instead, her reaction likely reflects a moment of unwinding before finalising her psychiatric findings,” notes Khangarot.