User talk:188.65.190.67: Difference between revisions

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I’m Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Traveler— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:04, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Deji have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Materialscientist (talk) 10:16, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I’m DoebLoggs. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Grey alien have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. DoebLoggs (talk) 09:31, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Grey alien. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kinetic37 (talk) 09:34, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to All-Ireland Senior Hurling Championship have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:30, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Hey man im josh. I noticed that in this edit to Peter McVerry, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don’t worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:49, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Temple menorah, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Opal|zukor^(discuss) 12:54, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Temple menorah, you may be blocked from editing. Opal|zukor^(discuss) 12:57, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Temple menorah. Adakiko (talk) 13:07, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Trisandya have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Trisandya was changed by 188.65.190.67 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.919257 on 2023-06-17T22:20:20+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:20, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m LizardJr8. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Nicola Peltz—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 14:12, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to ROSA (organisation), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. The article for ROSA (organisation) unfortunately confused an international organisation with one of its national sections, and while doing so used a high-level of sources that were inappropriate (see WP:ABOUTSELF). The contents that were sources via reliable third party sources have been included in the appropriate section about ROSA on the article for International Socialist Alternative. Please do not revert the redirect again. Rambling Rambler (talk) 23:04, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at ROSA (organisation), you may be blocked from editing. You look to be editing to accuse organisations of being fronts given your edit summaries. Please desist. Rambling Rambler (talk) 23:26, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not accusing them of being a front. There have been accusations of them being a front. Which are relevant given as you seem intent on deleting the page entirely, reducing it to essentially being front for ISA as you keep redirecting the page to. Which it is no longer even affiliated with. Your accusations of vandalism are projection. @Rambling Rambler 188.65.190.67 (talk) 23:59, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You don’t seem to know what a redirect is. Redirection is not deletion. Given you are now introducing completely inaccurate content from inappropriate sources I’m assuming this is now willful attempts to damage the accuracy of the article for off-wiki reasons and will be Rambling Rambler (talk) 00:08, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting a standalone organization to that of a separate organization, one that it is no longer affiliated is grossly negligent behavior and erased the independent identity of the organization. Citing the organization is not “inappropriate” as it prints its own newsletter. Self referential yes. Inappropriate? No. Please report yourself if you report anyone for attempting to delete an entire page. 188.65.190.67 (talk) 00:14, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Their own social media shows ROSA is still affiliated to the ISA[1]. You seem to be wilfully intent on suggesting otherwise despite it being patently untrue while introducing material negative about the ISA while using inappropriate sources. Stop. Rambling Rambler (talk) 00:17, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The latest social media post from your citation from 2024. Pre disaffiliation. Media literacy isn’t your strongest suit. @Rambling Rambler 188.65.190.67 (talk) 00:34, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per your edit summary here[2] don’t try and quote WP:ABOUTSELF if you’re going to immediately break it, in particular how it mustn’t “involve claims about third parties”. Making allegations of abuse about someone else is certainly a claim about a third party. Rambling Rambler (talk) 00:22, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As a former constituent of ISA, Socialist Party is qualified to address their own accusations. 188.65.190.67 (talk) 00:36, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users’ edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article’s talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 01:38, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IP, please don’t call other editors’ edits “vandalism”. That has a specific meaning on Wikipedia: please see WP:NOTVAND. Thanks. — asilvering (talk) 00:45, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop edit warring and discuss this at a talk page. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 01:56, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]