Can you guarantee that the results will be updated…: ce
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 08:51, 22 March 2025 | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
|
::1: Failing to show it as “shorlisted” misleads the reader into thinking that the book has only been submitted as an entry to a pending competition. Once the competition is over, “pending” misleads the reader into thinking that the competition is still pending.
|
::1: Failing to show it as “shorlisted” misleads the reader into thinking that the book has only been submitted as an entry to a pending competition. Once the competition is over, “pending” misleads the reader into thinking that the competition is still pending.
|
||
|
::2: “Pending” shows the reader that the competition is still not complete, but hides the fact that the book has been longlisted or shortlisted.
|
::2: “Pending” shows the reader that the competition is still not complete, but hides the fact that the book has been longlisted or shortlisted.
|
||
|
::3: Any table can be updated once a source is available for the revised information. If 12 books are longlisted and 6 are shortlisted, then 6 of those entries will require no further update. All of the entries will be accurate, even though understating the achievement of the book: the book will always have been longlisted, even if it turns out eventually to be
|
::3: Any table can be updated once a source is available for the revised information. If 12 books are longlisted and 6 are shortlisted, then 6 of those entries will require no further update. All of the entries will be accurate, even though understating the achievement of the book: the book will always have been longlisted, even if it turns out eventually to be
|
||
|
::shortlisted and perhaps the winner.
|
|||
|
::4: {{tl|pending}} is not currently the standard, and I do not believe it should be.
|
::4: {{tl|pending}} is not currently the standard, and I do not believe it should be.
|
||
|
::I asked you not to continue using this template elsewhere because I believe it damages the encyclopedia. Please do not introduce this new “standardized” formatting without discussion with other editors.
|
::I asked you not to continue using this template elsewhere because I believe it damages the encyclopedia. Please do not introduce this new “standardized” formatting without discussion with other editors.
|
||